WAR PHOTOGRAPHY: FINE LINE BETWEEN REPORTAGE AND DEATH

YOU TUBE has removed the video of war photographer Tim Hetherington being laid out by staff at the Misrata Hospital in Libya.

The man who posted the video which also contained images of Getty photographer Chris Hondros, uploaded it in good faith, and only after much deliberation. The decision to do so took moral courage and carried a warning that it contained graphic images. Therefore, and as always, it was a personal decision whether one looked at it or not.

I saw the video before You Tube decided it was unsuitable for public viewing, a decision with which I disagree.

The images of the dead Hetherington were a closure. If you’ve ever lost someone as I have, in curious circumstances and with no corpse, there is no closure on his life. The doctors handled Tim gently and if any of his family and friends managed to see the video, they would certainly have been upset. But it was an end.

My problem with You Tube in this case, is that they allow graphic footage of wounded and dead Afghans, Africans - you name them - to be displayed, but censor respectful photos of a famous photo-journalist killed in action.

I never met Tim, but I admired his skill as a photographer and in particular his evident concern for the unfortunates displaced by warfare. I also believe he wouldn’t have minded being photographed as a dead man. He was after all, a film-maker.

May you rest in peace Tim and thank you for the many times you risked your life to depict people caught in conflict.

Tim Hetherington, 40 and Chris Hondros 41, were killed on 20 April in the battle for Misrata.

Images: Chris Hondros, Tim Hetherington, photo Chris Hondros/Getty

THE HELMAND CONUNDRUM

What`s to be done about British deployment in Afghanistan, following mistaken assumptions of al-Qaeda links to Iraq, post 9/11?

I visited Iraq twice under the regime of Saddam Hussein and while there is no question he was Evil, Iraq was one of the most advanced societies in the Arab world. Urban women were educated, oil and alcohol flowed - and certainly `Saddam` was as fearful of an al-Qaeda plot on home-soil as much as the Americans were paranoid about WMD.

Now we have Al-Qaeda operating from the ungovernable Tribal Agencies of Pakistan and criminal Taliban elements detonating British troops in Helmand province with their endless supply of home-made bombs.

Since time immemorial, Afghanistan and Pakistan-to-be, have known invasion - Persian, Greek, Hun, Arab, Mogul, British imperialists in the late nineteenth century, and ultimately the Russians, in 1979. None was successful in taming the feudal rockpile.

As I understand it, the original deployment in Helmand was aimed at ridding the south of Taliban and curbing the prodigious local poppy harvest. But the Taliban remain and the red flower flourishes, watered by the blood of brave, young soldiers.

Sending further air support is essential, but merely palliative without a contingency plan for backup on the ground and to be totally effective, the dismantling of archaic tribal systems based on the jirga and family honour. Although clearly, the latter will take generations.

The way forward, is to assist Afghanistan to help itself build the type of society it needs - and this might well not be Westminster-style democracy- it`s about winning hearts and minds (and a good start might be to see some of the warlords tried for crimes).

c. Christine Osborne

Image: Rural child and tank, Afghanistan

Source: Tim Gurney www.copix.co.uk